Architecture and Interior Design Decision-Making Consultation Services
FAQ
Purpose
To keep projects on track/on schedule. Slow or no decision-making leads to projects that fall behind schedule and therefore cost more and have added stress/aggravation.
We understand the power of design to solve problems, and we have studied the art of decision-making for decades. We believe that our decision-making process makes projects better.
Because of our expertise in design and construction, and our proven ability to understand needs and wants from clients, contractors, OPMs, and other architects, we are singularly able to listen to all “sides” on a project and help get the right decisions made to the right questions to end up with the right project for each particular project.
Although we could fill that role, this service is very focused on decision making and keeping the design flame intact. We do not write meeting notes. We do not coordinate sub-contractors, etc.
We have been brought into projects by the Construction Manager/Contractor, by the architect, and by friends of the client. Although all of our previous projects were in the midstream of a project that was running into time/budget constraints or just decision-making problems, we probably could be more helpful by being part of the team from the very beginning.
Even though we are usually brought in by others, the client/building owner pays for our services. Why? Because this is the best way to get the project back on track, which is the client’s priority and is to their benefit. On construction projects, we usually attend weekly construction meetings among clients, architecture and engineering consultants, contractors, and OPMs.
There may be a backlog of undecided questions/issues when we first come in, so our start-up meetings can be long, but after our trust among the team increases, the meetings are shorter and more effective. We only bill for time on the project, so we are agnostic about the overall budget for the project.
As part of our decision-making consultation, we start with a review of the priorities, or if unclear, we perform a prioritization process. We strive to keep the design intact in the high-priority areas. This means that although the client may have been told to eliminate an expensive design element, we may be able to identify ways to keep the design intact, but in a less expensive or more readily available way. We want to assist the team in getting the best project possible withing the time and budget constraints.
All official design revisions should be done by the original architect on the project, or if not possible, as an additional service, by our team. Often a quick sketch by Leslie is enough for the contractor to evaluate any cost savings, and for the project architect to confirm/approve the new design concept.
It’s important to us that every team member sees us as an asset to the project, not as competition. We are available to coach each member of the team on our research-based method of how to present to clients in order to get faster better decisions. It’s fun and it works!

